Bajaj Auto Slapped With Rs 138 Crore GST Demand Notice

Bajaj Auto has received a tax demand notice from the Maharashtra State Tax Department regarding GST classification differences. The company plans to challenge the order, asserting its classification practices are legally valid.

Bajaj Auto Slapped with Rs 138 Crore GST Demand, Says Order Lacks Merit

Bajaj Auto Slapped with Rs 138 Crore GST Demand, Says Order Lacks Merit

In a regulatory filing Bajaj Auto declared that they received an order from the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, Pune, under Section 73 of the Maharashtra GST Act, 2017. The order pertains to the financial year 2020-21 and demands a tax payment of Rs 1,38,53,14,020. The dispute arises over the classification of auto parts under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) framework.
"The Company has received the Order with tax demand amounting to Rs 1,38,53,14,020. The tax demand mainly relates to differential tax liability between specific HSN classification adopted by the Company with GST rate of 18% as against general HSN classification of auto parts alleged by tax authorities with GST rate of 28%. According to tax authorities, Company being a manufacturer of automobiles, the entire spare parts being customised product, used only in manufacturing of vehicles would get classified as auto parts at GST rate of 28% disregarding the principle of general rules of interpretation. The Order also imposes applicable interest and penalty of Rs 13,85,49,375," the order said.
Responding to the order Bajaj Auto clarified that, The Company believes that it has strong case on merits as it has been consistently classifying its parts and accessories over more than 3 decades following the General Rules of Interpretation, relevant section notes, chapter notes and HSN Explanatory notes which are supported by various judicial precedents. Such specific HSN classification has been accepted by the tax authorities over the years.
"The said Order is an appealable order and the Company has initiated appropriate legal action as per law" automaker said in the filing.

Log in to post a comment.

End of Article